There’s really only one truly great and memorable sequence
in “World War Z,” the latest zombie related entertainment the industry has
thrown at us. The scene takes aboard an airplane flight. Everything seems to be
going well until an infected person (zombie) makes its way up from the cargo
hold. Then all hell breaks loose. So where do you go exactly to get away from a
zombie when you’re aboard an airplane? It’s a scary thought; perhaps the whole
movie should have taken place on the plane. It worked for snakes, why not
infected, raging humans? I looked forward to “World War Z,” not as a fan of the
book (which I haven’t read), nor as a huge zombie fan (though I am), but more
as a huge fan of disaster flicks. A movie that looks like “War of the Worlds”
meets “28 Days Later?” I’m so there. The problem is, the movie just sort of
quickly moves along without giving us anything truly memorable or giving us
anyone to really care all that much about.
Brad Pitt gives a good performance in “World War Z” and it
was truly fun to be able to watch someone of his caliber sort of slumming it in
a zombie related summer action flick. Check out his filmography. While he does
do fun movies (Ocean’s Eleven), action movies (Mr. and Mrs. Smith) and silly
movies (Burn After Reading) you’d be hard pressed to find just a flat out
awesome summer action thriller on his resume. This film could have been it, but
alas it just disappoints. The film begins like “War of the Worlds” in that it
follows the plight of a family trying to survive the immediate onslaught of a
terrible disaster; humans have been come infected with a rage virus which is
spreading like wildfire. There are explosions and lots of people are killed and
it’s pure chaos. But quickly (way too quickly) the family is saved by Gerry
Lane’s (Pitt) colleagues from the United Nations where he used to be employed. His
wife and two young daughters are whisked away to a US navy ship, where the
family is no longer in jeopardy for the entire rest of the film. And Gerry goes
off to various exotic locations like South Korea and Jerusalem in order to
figure out how this outbreak occurred and how to stop it.
The problem is that none of the sequences Gerry’s involved
in (save for that airplane scene I mentioned) aren’t nearly as exciting nor as
frightening as they should be. The film sets up such a scary situation (though
rather too quickly if you ask me) and then really doesn’t do much with it. The
book, as I’ve heard, doesn’t follow a straight narrative and is rather a
collection of various accounts about how this zombie war began, started, and
ended. And even though the film follows one main character, we never really get
to spend that much time knowing him or really caring all that much if he gets
back to his family. We know they’re safe and we know since Gerry is the lead
that everyone will most likely live happily ever after.
I’m not quite sure what the problem here is. Could it be
that direct Marc Forster, who is a competent enough director though nothing
special, has tried his hand at way too many different types of genres? He bounces
from drama (Monster’s Ball) to comedy (Stranger Than Fiction) to action (Quantum
of Solace) without any of them sharing any similar vision. I would have
preferred to see James Cameron or Steven Spielberg or Ridley Scott or
Christopher Nolan or even Frank Darabont’s interpretation of “World War Z.”
Forster’s film just looks and feels bland; there’s nothing very visually
interesting going on. And at this point it's just cliché to blame co-screenwriter Damon Lindelof, so I won't even blame him.
“World War Z” is not a horrible movie. The design of the
zombies is pretty good. I like how they run and swarm like giant hordes of
ants, even if some will say the effects looks kind of cheesy. They even climb
on top of each other to scale walls. Of course they’re not your typical “back from
the dead” type of zombies. They’re just infected by an unknown virus. The film’s
conclusion isn’t horrible either (much has been said in the press about the
film’s extensive reshoots and reworking of its ending). And there’s that plane
sequence I’ve mentioned twice already. Like I said, the movie isn’t horrible. The
problem is that as a disaster action movie the film is just merely ok (And let's not forget the PG-13 level lack of zombie gore) And when you have a summer filled
with excellent big budget Hollywood movies like “Iron Man 3” and “Star Trek into
Darkness,” it’s impossible to be great when your movie is as ordinary as “World
War Z;” or more appropriately, “World War Zzzzzzzz.” GRADE: C+
3 comments:
oakley sunglasses
ray ban sunglasses
denver broncos jerseys
polo ralph lauren
michael kors outlet
oakland raiders jerseys
kate spade sale
oakley sunglasses wholesale
michael kors canada
coach outlet
nike 270
jordan retro
yeezy
golden goose
caterpillar boots
michael kors outlet online
jordan 1 off white
yeezy boost 350
moncler
chrome hearts store
b2j95m4s99 w7x01b7t41 o1l66g7t26 n9x66s8c20 i2x30n7m48 z2k70w3x14
Post a Comment