It’s a proven fact that my brain lacks the ability to fully
comprehend anything Tolkien-related. Otherwise I can’t really explain my
distaste for the many fantasy epics that so many others love. It is with that
foundation that it must be said that the final film in “The Hobbit” series has
two things going for it: it’s officially the shortest of all these Middle
Earth-set films and it’s most definitely the last (at least for some time). “The
Hobbit” prequel series have always felt like a series of films made especially
for strict fans who can’t get enough of Middle Earth. Odds are if you’re into
fantasy films and enjoy seeing hobbits and elves and dwarves and other
fantastical creatures fight each other odds are “The Hobbit” is right up your
alley. But is it a fitting ending to the trilogy?
“The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies” is mostly all
action and why shouldn’t it be? Filmmaker Peter Jackson, who could practically
make one of these films blindfolded by now, had two films to set up the plot
and characters and get his audience invested in the story. If you were invested
in the first two films you’ll most likely care about who lives and who dies in
this third chapter. If you recall, we left off with the dragon Smaug being
unleashed on the town of Laketown. The film opens with a rousing disaster pic set
piece as Smaug attacks the small city. It feels like a great opening but it
also feels like it should have actually been the ending of the previous film.
How much of an awesome cliffhanger would it have been to not know whether Bard
(Luke Evans) and his son were killed in the destruction?
After Smaug’s destruction a bunch of stuff happens that i
could care less about. And apparently every group of fantastical creature in
Middle Earth wants the mountain filled with gold. Orcs and elves and trolls and
more attack the dwarves in the mountain leading to the battle of the film’s
title. It’s all rousing and I found myself decently entertained throughout even
if I personally didn’t feel very invested in the conflict. There’s something
about our hobbit hero Bibo (Martin Freeman) hiding an Infinity Stone, err,
sorry wrong universe, the Arkenstone which in true McGuffin form “does
something important.”
I personally can’t distinguish these three Hobbit films from
each other very well. They all feel like one cohesive narrative, so I’m not
sure that one is really better than another. And the evenly paced film nice and
neatly leads right into the beginning of The Fellowship of the Ring. This last
entry has the most action and fighting so that’s either a good thing or a bad
thing depending on what floats your boat. Odds are if you’ve enjoyed the first
two films there’s not much to complain about here. It won’t necessarily make
anyone beg and plead for yet another trip to Middle Earth and I’ve certainly
had my share.
Trailer for The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies on TrailerAddict.
2 comments:
pelangsing badan paling mujarab
penyebab gigi kuning
masalah seksual pria
obat wasir berdarah
sedia obat herbal
yeezy
nike air vapormax
yeezy 500
off white hoodie
golden goose slide
lacoste online shop
moncler coat
off white shoes
nike air max 270
kyrie 5
Post a Comment