I maintain that
“Split” is a wildly uneven film; the film’s third act
completely derailed for me but I’m fine with James McAvoy’s
impressive performance. So how does one discuss “Glass” without
spoiling “Split?” Just by virtue of existing “Glass” spoils
“Split” if you haven’t seen it. The twist of “Split” is
that its actually set in the same world of M. Night Shyamalan’s
post-“Sixth Sense” film “Unbreakable.” “Glass” brings
characters from “Split” and “Unbreakable” together to create
a completely fine film; it’s not horrendous, it’s not
magnificent. It’s easily middle tier Shyamalan as that’s what
he’s been churning out lately. Those seeking something on the level
of his greatest work “The Sixth Sense” need not apply.
“Unbreakable”
was a film audiences weren’t quite ready for nor what we were
expecting. I recall having an oddly cold reception to it as most did.
But over time it’s reputation has grown, especially in a market
overrun by comic book films. No one was expecting a real life comic
book tale from the guy who made a scary ghost movie about a kid who
sees dead people. And what a better time to revisit the world of
“Unbreakable?” “Glass” works as a sequel to “Unbreakable”
but I’m not sure it works as a sequel to “Split.” Though
generally find it more of a success than that film. The storyline
involving Anya Taylor-Joy’s kidnapping survival heroine Casey is
sort of needless and uninteresting. Revisting a character who has
underwent a psychological trauma is interesting but “Glass”
doesn’t do anything interesting with it. The film’s real
successes lie with Bruce Willis’ character David Dunn and his young
adult son Joseph (Spencer Treat Clark) who has sort of become the
Alfred to his Batman.
Anyone expecting any
sort of traditional super hero narrative is going to be wildly
disappointed. The film spends a majority of the story as our three
main characters spend time being studied in an institution. That
includes master criminal, who started this whole thing, Elijah Prince
aka “Mr. Glass” played by Samuel L. Jackson. New to the series is
Sarah Paulson whose character is a psychiatrist who specializes in
disorders in which people think their superheroes. That’s all fine
and dandy but it’s the scenes before David is captured that truly
thrill while the film spends too much time psychoanalyzing its
characters. And the film’s final act is sort of a mixed bag, I
can’t imagine most audiences will be thrilled with how everything
plays out.
“Glass” works
much better as an “Unbreakable” sequel than a “Split” sequel
because I just still don’t find the “Beast” character very
interesting or believable, though McAvoy is good in the role. The
film’s music score from West Dylan Thordson is fantastic as is the
film’s impressive production design. That pink room is
Oscar-worthy. Overall, “Glass” is fine. I’m sure it’s a film,
like “Unbreakable” that will see its reputation grow as time
passes. As for now, it isn’t quite anything earth shattering. GRADE: B-
1 comment:
افضل خدمات نقل العفش فى الكويت مقدمة من افضل شركة الرشيد لجميع خدمات النقل
شركة نقل عفش الكويت
فني صحي
Post a Comment